Skip to main content

Comedy Central's Pivot to Animation is Strange

I'm fascinated with media in general, but I'm especially fascinated with ViacomCBS. It's difficult for me to explain, I just find their history and where they are now to be interesting. In the '90s and 2000s, the Viacom channel lineup was filled with niche programming that was very successful at reaching a large young audience. Now that same niche programming that once lit the world on fire is stuck on cable, a world where the coveted 18-49 demographic isn't overwhelmingly watching and the buzz is simply not there. Other conglomerates have made quick moves to combat streaming, and while ViacomCBS is not only taking its time with developing its in-house solution, it's creating deals with its existing and future content with competing streaming services. There's ViacomCBS content across the board on Netflix, Hulu, HBO Max, Peacock, and everyone's favorite, Quibi. Plus content on CBS All Access, which has a rebrand coming soon. 

ViacomCBS is also attempting to strengthen their brands by presenting a clear vision for what the consumer can expect. MTV is all about unscripted reality shows, no shock there. Nickelodeon is for kids, Paramount Network is positioning itself as a premium entertainment brand. The rest of their brands make sense. Comedy Central, on the other hand, is making a move to movies, topical talk shows, and the surprising pivot to adult-oriented animation. Seeking to use the never-ending success of South Park, Comedy Central picked up reboots of Beavis and Butthead, Ren and Stimpy, and is doing a spinoff of a spinoff Jodie. The new programming makes sense, but with some of the recent cancellations of some very popular shows, it really makes me question the strategy.

Comedy Central over the years has been a hub for comedy fans with a wide range of content. Prior to South Park, the fledgling channel aired movies, stand-up specials, talk shows, a game show, and the occasional animated program, one of their early hits Dr. Katz: Professional Therapist. Once South Park aired and became a hit, the channel was able to gain traction and became a top channel. While they had some animated shows, the channel was well known for its popular stand-up specials, sketch comedy like the massive Chappelle's Show, which still reruns to this day, and of course its late night programs The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. With the exception of South Park, there's really no concrete evidence that animation overall was a strong category throughout the decades. If you look at ratings of recent new animated shows on the channel, they were no stronger than the recent new live-action programs.

Yet, when I first heard that Comedy Central was repositioning its programming toward adult animation, I assumed it would model what they've done with Paramount Network. While new programs being added are scripted premium series, like Yellowstone, its existing reality shows like Bar Rescue and Ink Master will play out until they run their course. After all, those existing shows are established and continue to bring in good viewership. 

This is seemingly not the case. It was announced a number of Comedy Central live-action shows will either be cancelled or move to another channel or streaming service. A few made sense, like South Side, The Other Two, and Alternatino, only because they're new and not especially highly viewed. But Tosh.0 and Drunk History, two shows that not only bring in high viewership for the channel, but in the case of Drunk History, won Emmy awards, came to me as a shock. 

I can only assume the reasoning for Drunk History's cancellation, and Tosh0's eventual relocation is financial. Deadline reported the cost of producing period-accurate Drunk History scenes may have been too much, and I can assume the longevity of Tosh.0 became too costly to continue on Comedy Central. However, this does question where this leaves the rest of the live-action shows, now only Crank Yankers and Comedy Central's only new hit Awkwafina is Nora from Queens. Will stand-up comedy, especially the popular Roast specials, still have a future on the channel? Considering the expansion of The Daily Show, will it fit with the new direction of the channel? What about the marathons of The Office and ViacomCBS's deal to air Seinfeld reruns? And if Tosh.0 is ripe for a relocation, with Comedy Central Productions seeking to produce shows outside the channel, what will be seen as something necessary for linear cable, or a streaming service?

My point is I just don't see the reasoning behind shifting development to animated programs. While the programs being developed certainly have potential for high viewership, I just don't understand choosing animation over the genres that have defined Comedy Central. I suppose if the live-action scripted and talk show programs had been successful, this change wouldn't need to take place. Animation could just be cheaper to produce than live-action so that's the priority, while something live-action or a stand-up special could still show up. Either way, we're in a strange time in media, where everyone's just trying to be the next Netflix and survive. Especially linear cable, and ViacomCBS is trying its best to please both cable operators who don't like streaming, and consumers who just want access to everything whenever they want it.

While ViacomCBS is still doing financially well, they have a rough road ahead of them, and I'm looking forward to seeing how they and the rest of the industry will all play out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review of the Chromecast with Google TV: Google Gets it Right

The History of Chromecast and Google TV For years, Google has been attempting to get into the living rooms of streaming consumers, but with little success. Google TV initially started in 2010 as a smart platform for third-party set top boxes and TV manufacturers. It never caught on as devices were expensive and the experience was generally slow and clunky, and it ended in 2014.  Within the Google TV timeframe, Google attempted to create its own TV devices called the Nexus Player and the Nexus Q. The Nexus Player used the same Google TV software, but never caught for the same reasons above. The Nexus Q was a device that wasn't controlled with a remote, but with an Android smartphone. The Q didn't sell well as it didn't support many apps, and required specific Android phones for it to function, but it found a niche of users that appreciated its unique no-remote functionality, and spherical design. Google listened to the Q's criticism and in 2013 released the Chromecast: a

Pluto TV: Viacom's Different Answer to Streaming

First, Some Context and History All the major media conglomerates are beginning to reign in their content from Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, and are bringing them to their own streaming services for maximum profits. AT&T, who owns WarnerMedia, Comcast, who owns NBCUniversal, and Disney, who also own Marvel and 21st Century Fox, have all announced that they are developing their own streaming services to house all of their valuable content available for a monthly fee. Want to watch Friends ? You'll have to subscribe to AT&T's thing. Want to watch The Office ? You'll also have to subscribe to Comcast's thing. They'll both probably cost around $10 a month, and you're also going to want Disney+, the home to Marvel. All of these companies are taking a non-linear subscription approach to delivering content, something that we first fell in love with when Netflix introduced their instant streaming service back when they were better known for delivering DVDs thro

What T-Mobile’s TVision Needs to Succeed

UPDATE: 11/2 - If you get TVision Live and Vibe, you don't need the $5 DVR add-on, and you can fast forward commercials on live. Let me just start out by saying I’ve been a happy T-Mobile wireless customer since 2016. If T-Mobile Home Internet were available in my area, I’d subscribe to that too, so it only makes sense that I’d want to get TVision, T-Mobile’s new cable alternative service. TVision was first unveiled a year ago as a more traditional cable service, where a cable box was required and the price was $90 a month - ouch. Luckily, T-Mobile learned from AT&T TV and realized people don’t want that form of cable anymore. A few days ago, T-Mobile announced TVision would release as a no-contract service available through an app, with plans as low as $10 a month - wow! But there are a few things to note: That $10 plan called TVision Vibe only includes entertainment channels with no sports and news, like Philo. You’ll get channels like Discovery, Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelod