Skip to main content

Why does the MacBook charge by USB-C?

Most posts that are titled with a question then answer it in the post, but this is a serious question that I have, and one that I've been thinking about for a while now; Why would a company like Apple put USB-C on the MacBook? It totally makes sense why, because it's reversible, versatile, and it's compact, but why USB-C and not by Apple's own Lightning?

Some might say USB-C is more powerful for a full computer, but the MacBook is running on a very light Intel Core M processor that's even fan-less. Plus, if the Lightning cable is powerful enough to power a beefy iPad Pro, while also allowing for video-out, speedy transfers, and everything else the Lightning cable can do, it should also be powerful enough for a MacBook. Not to mention that everything else in Apple's mobile line-up is powered by the Lightning cable, such as the new Apple TV Remote, the iPad Pro Pencil, the Beats Pill+, and every iOS device currently sold. So why not the MacBook?

I'm not condoning Apple's history of proprietary hardware, but it's just a surprisingly open decision. By using USB-C, it allows for other accessories from PCs and tablets that use USB-C to also work with the MacBook. That might've been the reasoning for using USB-C is that because it's considered a computer, it should be a more open platform, but that says a lot about their mobile devices if they can't be open as well. The Mac is sort of forced to work with PC accessories because it has a lower market share, so it has to be compatible with what the user already has. This may be old-school thinking, but why can't the iOS devices be the same way? Sure, Micro-USB wasn't sexy, but USB-C is, except for that whole issue where bad cables were frying USB hubs and ports. Although USB-C isn't as thin as Lightning, it's still works the same way, and does just as much so why not use that on the new iPhone?

It just all depends on what Apple thinks is the future. Since the Apple Pencil and Apple TV Remote both use Lightning, I'm sure they'll be sticking with that for at least two more years. However, if USB-C starts to get really popular, maybe we could be seeing a switch to a more open platform from a company you wouldn't expect to make that decision.

Popular posts from this blog

Piratz Tavern has Closed, and I'm Glad

If you've ever seen the show Bar Rescue, you know that in most episodes, bar owners are decently pleased with the renovations that happen at the end of the episode. Understandably, some of the owners aren't pleased because they loved the bar they had, they just wanted it to be successful. To those owners who quietly took down the updates, or even kept them, that's cool. It's your business, do what you gotta do. One episode in particular did more than just some updates, however.

In the episode, a pirate bar in a corporate part of town in a state without an ocean called for help to Jon Taffer. Apparently, a bar with a pirate theme and a complete staff of costumed pirates in a state not known for pirates doesn't work very well, and the owner was over $900,000 in debt. Taffer found the usual mistakes: bland drinks, bad food, and cocky owners. When Taffer suggested to move away from a pirate theme to the owners and bartenders, it was like he suggested they cut their arm…

LG V20 vs. Samsung Galaxy Note 7

I showed up to the T-Mobile store on launch day of the Note 7. I waited in a line of 7, which the T-Mobile folk claimed was the most they'd ever seen for any launch. I intended to the get the blue one, but I settled for the silver one. Afterwards, my experience was alright, this is it. This is the phone I intend to keep for a while. And it was just alright.

When I first switched from the iPhone 6 Plus I had, I intended my next phone to have more useful features. Sure, the iPhone was great, but there was nothing special about it. So the next phone I got was the Samsung Galaxy Note 4. Had it not been for the lackluster battery life, it was great. I loved the S Pen, I thought the IR Blaster was convenient as hell, and I just felt like I could do what I wanted with the phone. After a few months I wanted to find a suitable replacement, and I went for a Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. That was great too, better battery life, still had the IR Blaster, but it was noticeably slower. Then I got …

2013 Jeep Patriot Review

If what you're looking for in a vehicle is the most patriotic sounding car, look no further than the Jeep Patriot. Or an American Motors Eagle. Oh, if I could've been a car buyer in the '80s, the Eagle would've been my ride. And honestly, they have a lot in common: they're both car-based crossovers designed to give 4WD when you need it. The only thing the Patriot is missing are those sweet door handles and the gigantic windows. And wood paneling.

The Jeep Patriot was designed to be a baby Liberty/Wrangler for those who want better fuel economy in an SUV with a Jeep logo on it. In 2007 when the Patriot was released, there was no Renegade, or Cherokee to provide for a fuel efficient alternative, your other choices were the Compass, which looks like a baby Grand Cherokee, the tank Liberty, and the family-sized Grand Cherokee and Commander. Now that the Jeep lineup has the Renegade, Compass, and Cherokee, where does the Patriot fit in? Well, it won't for long, beca…